The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report was pretty dire, and Treehugger writer Sami Grover tells us we can’t rely on New Zealand, but there’s always Mars! 3D printing company ICON is laying the groundwork for printing buildings on the moon and Mars by squeezing out Mars Dune Alpha, a 3D-printed habitat at the Johnson Space Center in Houston.
The 1,700-square-foot structure is designed by architecture firm Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) to “simulate a realistic Mars habitat to support long-duration, exploration-class space missions.”
The Crew Health and Performance Exploration Analog (CHAPEA) is a series of one-year-long simulations of a trip to Mars, testing out food systems “as well as physical and behavioral health and performance outcomes for future space missions.”
According to ICON, additive construction technology (the proper name for 3D printing) would eliminate the need for transporting building materials from Earth, which makes sense: Concrete is only about 10% cement, and one could use Martian sand for the rest, mix it up with some Martian water and squirt it out with automated printers.
Jason Ballard, CEO of ICON, is quoted in a press release:
Bjarke Ingels is known for his exuberant architecture, which is why I have often called him BJARKE! –everything about him has exclamation marks. Yet the plan of this building is low-key, almost banal. There are crew quarters at one end, workstations at the other, with shared stuff in between. The only Bjarkean feature appears to be the “varying ceiling heights vertically segmented by an arching shell structure accentuate the unique experience of each area to avoid spatial monotony and crewmember fatigue.”
Bjarke says, “Together with NASA and ICON, we are investigating what humanity’s home on another planet will entail from the human experience.” He claims that the building, a windowless rectangular box with a plan that looks like a modern university dormitory with brown textured wallpaper, “will potentially lay the foundation for a new Martian vernacular.”
Fred Scharmen, architect and author of “Space Settlements,” was underwhelmed as well, telling Treehugger:
It’s likely that this project had a program determined by NASA and Bjarke didn’t have a lot of wiggle room. The ICON printer could have made the rooms any shape or form, and this building design could have been more easily and cheaply built out of steel studs and drywall. In fact, the wonderful printer and all that cement is pretty much wasted, building this inside another building.
It’s a shame, and a missed opportunity, given that when he “Bjarked” the moon for ICON with the Olympus Base, it was so much more interesting, demonstrating the potential of the technology. In this particular project, the 3D printer is once again, a solution looking for a problem.
